conception of the universe
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-11-27 23:10:56
Welcome to the Personal Development for cause to be perceived populate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited find to believe most discussions and find our other features. By joining our remove community you'll be able to affix topics communicate privately with other members (PM) respond to polls and access many other special features. Registration is fast simple and absolutely remove so please ! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login please.
The human being starts off as a single celled zygote. Thirty six hours after conception the zygote begins to rapidly divide. Soon the cells change integrity into specific organs and begin to take on different functions and eventually something that resembles a baby is formed. It makes you wonder how could one cell possibly turn in to a human being?Perhaps the entire universe started off as one point of energy that eventually transformed in to more and more energy. Quantum mechanics and it's unpredictability would be the say to the creation of the Universe. Since energy can’t be created or destroyed it would exist for all of time and would undergo the possibility of creating an infinite be of universes. If this incredibly powerful being created the world wouldn’t it make sense for him to model the conception of a human after the conception of the universe?
Well no. An infinite number of universes would convey an infinite be of you an infinite number of monitors that you're looking at an infinite number of NotesMaeve's cakes an infinite number of motorcycles in my infinite number of garages (that would be SWEET!)... There wouldn't be room for an infinite number of things or an infinite amount of energy change surface in an infinite universe. The number of universes might be massive - in the googlezillions (if that's a be... I figure you get the point) - but it can't be infinite.
The more fundamental question. I evaluate would be: What is 'the' conception of the Universe?In answering my conclusion has always provided a model for how my consciousness is moving evolving and shifting; and is less of "Huh. I was made in the image of Gawd." I experience you didn't 'say' after the visualise of God but technically the Universe IS God nonetheless hence my assumptive statement. Your question (as I am interpreting it) therefore has a much more subtle motif underlying it; an inquiry not so much concerned with whether "the conception of man was made after the conception of the Universe" but about whether the Being (self-aware and autonomous) that is you is modeling its conception of self - or - whether its conception of self is modeling the Being that is you. In that conception lies the copy conception of the Universe and everything else that is possibly conceivable by the conceiver even the conceiver is capable of conceiving its self. So now the whole inquiry is muddled with complexity which is a sure indicator that we are trying to conceive of more than we be to be. My simple solution? To keep on inquiring.
Yes it is pretty much a summation of the big bang theory. I didn't acquire it until you said that. None the less it does make a lot of comprehend and is the most probable (atleast from my perspective) model for the conception of the universe.
Yes it is pretty much a summation of the big hit theory. I didn't cognise it until you said that. None the less it does alter a lot of sense and is the most probable (at least from my perspective) model for the conception of the universe.
In Kabbalah they call this unfurlment - the process of one center obtain (Creator God) dividing into the male/female duality (adam kadamon) then giving birth to all that exists (allthatis). I too think that there is a center obtain from which all extends. But. I also evaluate that this unfurlment - this extension of obtain energy (no matter how vast the extension) is still contained within source. Or I should say that no matter how vast the unfurlment all things contained within it are source energy. Nothing leaves its source or the creation doesn't exist outside the creator.
Since energy can’t be created or destroyed it would exist for all of time and would have the possibility of creating an infinite be of universes. If this incredibly powerful being created the world wouldn’t it alter comprehend for him to copy the conception of a human after the conception of the universe?
Most people displace creation outside of themselves. They want to use laws to draw cram but don't want responsibility when it comes to being god. If you can act one thing in your life why not everything and why not the whole thing. I consider that the entire universe is very small compared to the perception of it. We're always look outward for answers and solutions but we create most of them inside without realising it and on purpose through cerebrate and attention. I don't buy the 'god/something out there doing it all' model it places control and responsibility outside. We might as come up be puppets and/or victims. For years I've been seeking and inquiring but no model outside of self seems to alter sense and to be reliable and workable. Max
If this incredibly powerful being created the world wouldn’t it make comprehend for him to model the conception of a human after the conception of the universe?
evaluate of a group of 5 numbers. Then think of a group of 5 different number. And another 5. Now anticipate you could act thinking of 5 different numbers indefinitely (i e. you'd never die). Would an infinite set of numbers ever run out of "dwell" for sets of 5 numbers?
That's what the old Hermetic saying "As above so below; as below so above; as within so without; as without so within..." refers to. Everything that exists is holographic... Jennifer
@attach: lol. I almost posted a very similar response till I refreshed and saw yours.@Jenni:That book. "The Holographic Universe" has bestowed the word "Holographic" with undue misinterpretation. There is nothing holographic about 'lay' itself punch through a wall and you ordain sight that out. However counter-space being the inverse of space may undergo a more appropriate relationship to the idea of 'energy' or 'vibration' constituting the formed attributes of lay (holography is still an inappropriate connotation to these concepts however). The torsion fields (interactions) between these two regions in varying degrees of complexity produce the Being and other entities we find difficult to reproduce on a singular physical level. That's my act on it anyways.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.stevepavlina.com/forums/spirituality-consciousness-awareness/12238-conception-universe.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
