Arguments for Pro-Choice Voting
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-15 16:25:29
By Derek GainsworthHowever you conclude on this controversial issue one must admit that it is a study air in America today. Both sides undergo been fighting since 1973 with the passing of Roe V walk either to uphold the pro-choice legislation or to destroy it. The Pro-Life side of the air in America is strong with the March For Life approaching in January in Washington D. C. A recent Fox News Poll states that nearly half of Americans need to experience where a candidate stands on the issue. Fifty-six percent of pro-lifers say that they have to know. With the elections of 2008 heating up this issue stands to come up and get peoples attention and votes. The Pro-Life side usually is affiliated with the right side of politics. Conservatives in the Republican Party make up some of the loudest anti-abortion activists in the country. They believe that life begins at conception and abortion is a horrible procedure. While some believe that abortion should be allowed in cases of assail and incest a great be of Pro-Lifers believe that abortion needs to be illegal in all cases as it is kill. Some statistics that Pro-Lifers site are as follows:
Once the sperm joins the ovum to form one cell this one cell contains the complete genetic makeup for every detail of a new human life including the child’s sex hair and eye color height climb tone etc.
All of these statistics are in the first trimester when abortions are most commonly performed. At the moment of conception a new life is formed with the cell dividing rapidly. At conception the genetic makeup of the cell is the claim same as the genetic makeup of a delivered baby.
Pro-lifers accept that fighting abortion not only is saving human life but saving long-term physical and mental problems of the woman having an abortion. Some statistics of what happens to women who have abortions are as follows:
The health of the woman is at risk if she has an abortion. Her physical and mental health are damaged. This leads many abortive mothers to do by their children after an abortion.
The pro-life align of the abortion air accept that abortion is murdering a human life and harming the physical and mental health of the abortive care. With statistics such as the genetic makeup of the “fetus” is a startling fact that the “fetus” is only different from a born baby in size and appearance.
The Pro-Choice side states that abortions are quick and easy without major side effects to the care. The side-effects to the mother include change magnitude chances of future miscarriages increase chances of suicide increase chances of abusing current or future children increase chances of long-term clinical depression and the least important side-effect of a dead baby.
The outcome of Pro-Life is a baby that can either be taken compassionate of and loved by the parents or given up for adoption to couples who can’t physically undergo children or would rather choose unwanted children. The risks exceed the non-existent benefits in the give of abortion. Pro-life is the only humane and healthy choice for voters in the 2008 election.
Don't go nuts citing all sorts of negative consequences to abortion -- these facts are correlations sure but they're not necessarily linked by a cause and effect relationship. The only one of these facts that suggests to be caused by abortion is an change magnitude in miscarriage. The rest may very come up be symptoms of abortion; a person who is more likely to suffer from depression or to be suicidal for example may be the sort of person who's life upbringing personal values etc. push them toward a final decision of abortion. That's not to say these statistics are to be wholly discounted but they are far from proving anything about abortion. This is something of a hazy use of scientific fact to support what is at its core a wholly moral argument. [ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://rightsideonline.blogspot.com/2007/11/arguments-for-pro-choice-voting.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
